The importance of Olympic weightlifting for the âSport of Fitnessâ
1) General Introduction:
The mere practice of the Olympic lifts teaches an athlete how to apply large amounts of force. Part of the extraordinary abilities of an Olympic lifter arises out of his having learned how to effectively activate more of his muscle fibers more rapidly than others who arenât trained to do so. This becomes extremely important for athletes who need to remain at lower body weights for athletic purposes but need to learn how to apply greater force.âArtie Dreschler
Mr. Dreschler literally . Clearly he wasnât writing for competitive exercisers, but his comment could not be any more appropriate in relation to our sport. I say this at every camp, and Iâll say it again here: Rich Froning has the highest WL total of any Games athleteâRich Froning has won the Games twice.
The debate on the importance of weightlifting should stop with my last statement, but fools will continue to quarrel. So hereâs a quote from âWere the Games Well Programmed?â on Anders Larsonâs :
What is clear from this is that HQ puts a large value on the Olympic lifts. The clean and snatch were worth a total of 5.35 events on their own! Add in shoulder-to-overhead (0.67) and thatâs more than 6 events worth of points based on the Olympic lifts. Although I am a big fan of the Olympic lifts myself, I do think the snatch in particular was over-valued. It was worth nearly 14% of all the available points, including 20% of the Open and 17% of the Regional.
These are actual numbers and facts, not opinions about what you âthinkâ will be programmed. Larson also has added up the total point values for every movement tested during both the 2011 and 2012 Games seasons. The Snatch and Clean & Jerk are worth 20 percent of the total point value. If you add accessories, you have 36 percent of the total point valueâread that again, except in all caps: THIRTY-SIX PERCENT. I can and will talk about exactly how the lifts develop the athlete from an overall perspective, but strictly from a sporting perspective, thatâs a lot of points.
We are not programming for and coaching athletes to be Olympic weightlifters. Our athletesâ success in Olympic weightlifting is secondary to this fact: to be successful in the âsport of fitness,â they must be good weightlifters. Rich Froningâs 293kg Total (in f-ing Nanos) would have been good for third place at the 2012 American Open. Rich Froning is the two-time CrossFit Games champion.
2) Science:
> Rate of force development
> Kinetic chain synchronization
> Neural recruitment
These are just a few of the benefits of Olympic weightlifting. They are buzzwords that are sometimes thrown around without definition, and they are all paramount to athletic performance. Athletes who compete in âthe sport of fitnessâ are no different from athletes in any other sport. They must develop the ability to apply force, in a synchronized manner, and do it as quickly and efficiently as possible. The great difference is that our sport awards roughly 30 to 40 percent of its points based upon proficiency in the Olympic lifts, whereas athletes who compete in nonfitness-related sports use the Olympic lifts as strictly a training protocol to develop athletic potential.
All sports require different amounts of muscle synchronization, balance, flexibility, and coordination as well as strength, speed, power, and metabolic development. Olympic weightlifting provides development in all these areas. While training for maximal strength can have a positive effect on performance, it also can have a ânegative effect on movement speed and the ability of a muscle to display explosive effortâ (Wenzel & Perfetto 1992). However, this does not mean that strength gains do not happen through training at high speeds. Wenzel and Perfetto characterized strength gains from high-speed training as adaptations âdue to an increase in the number of fibers recruited or a more synchronous firing of motor neuronsâ (Wenzel & Perfetto 1992).âPhilip Sabatini, .
The single most important requirement for strength development is the ability to produce force. Force, in terms of strength training and athleticism, is the bodyâs ability to recruit and initiate muscular contraction. Greater ability to produce force means greater ability to act upon external load, greater ability to control/manipulate the body in space, and greater ability to maintain efficiency with higher-repetition sub-maximal endeavors. The single best tool to gain the ability to develop force is strength training. The strength training protocol used must involve movements performed at either maximal or near-maximal weight (90 percent plus), or lighter weight moved as quickly as possible (70 to 90 percent). The ability to produce force, sans coordination, is a quintessential component of athleticism.
The kinetic chain is simply defined as a âcombination of several successively arranged joints constituting a complex motor unitâ (Steindler). The greatest/safest open chain tools we have to develop the kinetic function of multiple motor unitsâin our sport and in our trainingâare the Olympic lifts. The wave of contraction that must be produced to perform a full barbell Snatch is unparalleled by any other gym-based movement. To get similar kinetic chain development, you would have to play an actual sport for some length of time, and it would have to be a sport requiring massive amounts of mobility and joint stabilization (such as gymnastics). In my years of coaching I have seen more than my share of athletes who simply cannot perform a full Snatch or a comfortable Jerk. This is a prime example of dysfunction, inhibition, or tightness at some point in the kinetic chain and is NOT indicative that the movement is too hard to master or not for certain people. To the contrary; diagnosing these issues, taking steps to correct them, and continued practice of the lifts will allow for a greater overall development of the athleteâs kinetic chain, which will lead to the correction of a multitude of basic movement issues.
Hold on to your hats, boys and girls⊠Iâm going to quote Coach (thatâs Greg Glassman for those of you who have only been around a year or two):
The missing link in so much mainstream fitness programming, from bodybuilding to monostructural endeavors, is the neuromuscular pieceâin particular, the development of coordination, accuracy, agility, and balance. We can sum these elements up as âtechnique.â Omitting them from oneâs training necessarily results in only partial fitness, partial expression of oneâs genetic potential, and a decreased threshold of maximal capacity. To increase work capacity across broad time and modal domains (the goal of CrossFit), technique is the crucial connectionâwhether your goal is to win the game, protect your life, complete the mission, or just be fit for the demands of everyday life at any age.âGreg Glassman
Again, the Snatch takes center stage for this discussion. As the most highly technical movement in our sportâs training lexicon, it takes the prize for greatest/easiest high-level neural developer. And yes, again, high-level gymnastics and other sports can elicit similar neural responses, but the length of learning curve for those sports is far greater and, honestly, in most instances their practice is harder to pull off. Weightliftingâs ability to manipulate neural recruitment and the central nervous system through myriad rep and load variations is essential to âthe sport of fitness.â Sorry to use Rich again, but not only does he have a national-level Snatch, his 1:20 Isabel at the 2012 Games may have been one of the most efficient and impressive performances Iâve seen in person. With a high level of neural development, the athlete can move through greater ranges of motion with less effort, therefore allowing for greater capacity and less central nervous system fatigue.
...The Outlaw Way
